Development International e.V.

Partners / International organisations and public bodies

International organisations and public bodies

Is it working?

International organisations, bilateral agencies, legislators and regulators commission us when they need findings that will hold up in front of industry, civil society and government at the same time: evaluations of programmes and standards, measurement frameworks, prevalence studies and baselines for the review of laws.

What we bring to a public commission

Independence by constitution

As a registered public-benefit association we have no commercial reason to soften findings, and commissioned research remains scientifically independent. That is what makes an evaluation credible to every party at once.

Evaluation to OECD-DAC standards

Evaluations are structured against the six criteria where the commission requires it, with peer review built into the design and the level of claim stated: description, contribution or attribution.

Teams sized to the question

From two evaluators for a focused programme review to the nine-person international team that carried the OECD evaluation across three countries over three years.

Field presence where risks concentrate

Primary research in Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, the DRC, Burkina Faso, Nigeria, Senegal, South Africa, Kenya, Colombia, the Dominican Republic and Peru, through associates based in those regions.

Depth in specific commodities

Minerals and metals first, then cocoa and other agricultural commodities: conflict minerals, artisanal mining, child and forced labour, and due diligence regulation across jurisdictions.

Publication as our orientation

Most of what we do for public bodies is published. Where a report is the commissioner’s to release, we make the methods available and the data where we hold the rights.

Five kinds of commission

Each starts from a question a public body has to answer, and ends with a defined deliverable.

Evaluation

Did the programme or standard achieve its aims?

Independent evaluation of programmes, standards and policy instruments: quasi-experimental where data allow, contribution analysis where they do not, structured against OECD-DAC criteria and judged from the perspective of the people the intervention is meant to benefit.

You receive: the evaluation report, a mixed-methods evidence base, peer review, and an executive summary and briefs ready for dissemination.
Measurement framework

How will you know whether it is working?

Monitoring and evaluation frameworks for programmes and guidance: theory of change, indicators with data sources and cadence, protocols, and capacity building for those who will collect the data.

You receive: theory of change, indicator matrix, M&E protocol, reporting templates, and a capacity plan where needed.
Prevalence

How common is it, and is it changing?

Population-based surveys with probability sampling for phenomena without an administrative baseline: child labour, forced labour, working conditions, community knowledge and attitudes. Sensitive-measurement designs where people are afraid to answer.

You receive: prevalence estimates with confidence intervals, sampling documentation, longitudinal comparison where a baseline exists, and the data file and codebook.
Baseline for a law

Are companies meeting the requirement, and is the law achieving its aim?

Whole-market benchmarks of corporate compliance with a due diligence or disclosure law, giving regulators and legislative reviews the empirical baseline they need. The Commission must review the CSDDD’s effectiveness by 26 July 2031; a baseline built before 2029 gives that review its point of comparison.

You receive: a cross-sector compliance assessment, sectoral analysis, year-on-year trends where repeated, and inputs to a legislative impact assessment.
Economic modelling

What is the scale of the problem, and what would a rule cost?

Models of the scale of hidden phenomena and of the costs and benefits of regulatory options, built to be auditable and updated as data change.

You receive: a documented model with explicit assumptions, sensitivity analysis, and a legislative-ready summary with technical annex.

Work with international organisations and public bodies

2026

Mid-term evaluation of the ILO’s global HRDD4DW project

Independent evaluation of the global project on human rights due diligence for decent work. Under way. For the ILO · DI associates

2026

planetGOLD: terminal evaluation

Reducing mercury in artisanal and small-scale gold mining; fieldwork in the Philippines. Under way. For UNEP

2023–25

A decade of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance in 3T supply chains

Impact evaluation with difference-in-differences and nine case studies. For the OECD

2025

Evaluation of the ABS Initiative on BioTrade market pathways

OECD-DAC evaluation across Côte d’Ivoire, South Africa and Kenya. For GIZ

2022–23

Addressing root causes: private sector impacts on child labour outcomes

Systems modelling and 74 practices companies can use against root causes. For UNICEF

2021

Monitoring and evaluation framework for the OECD minerals Guidance

The framework later used for the impact evaluation. For the OECD Centre for Responsible Business Conduct

2021

50 billion euros: Europe’s child labour footprint in 2019

Economic modelling of EU imports associated with child labour. For the Greens/EFA group in the European Parliament

2011

Cost model of Dodd-Frank Section 1502 compliance

An economic cost projection largely reflected in the SEC’s Final Rule. Submitted to the US SEC · DI associates

2008–11

Oversight of initiatives against the worst forms of child labour in cocoa

Annual population-based surveys in Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana; four reports to the US Congress. For the US Department of Labor · DI associates

Tell us what the review will ask

Send us your terms of reference, or the question behind it, and we will propose a design that can answer it: the evidence available, the team, the timeline and the level of claim the findings will support.

Discuss a commission Our evaluations